IT Assessment

In six weeks, you will know where your technology function stands, what to address first and when adopting AI makes sense

An independent technology maturity assessment across six dimensions, for technology leaders who need to make decisions based on evidence, not intuition.

Book a meeting 30 minutes. No obligation.
Assessment framework Scale 1—5
1 2 3 4 5 Governance Architecture Operations Development Knowledge Talent

The assessment positions each dimension on the scale. The scores will be those of your organisation; what is shown here is the framework, not a result.

The business is moving faster than your technology function

It is not that technology is missing. The symptoms are visible, but the underlying causes — and their order of urgency — are not always clear:

  • Reactive processes: firefighting instead of anticipating.
  • Fragmented decisions, with no shared criteria between Technology and the rest of the organisation.
  • Knowledge that depends on key individuals rather than the organisation.

Is this the right time?

  • A strategic initiative requires Technology to rise to the challenge.
  • A regulatory change means you need to demonstrate control.
  • An integration or acquisition puts your current architecture to the test.
  • Pressure to adopt AI means you need to know whether your foundations can support it.

What you gain

A complete view of your technology function and a sequence of interventions you can defend before the executive committee — not an opinion, but a structured assessment across six dimensions, supported by interview evidence.

Independence

The report belongs to you

Everything we find and recommend belongs to you from day one. You can execute the roadmap with us, with another provider or with your own internal team — the value of the assessment does not depend on who implements it afterwards.

This is not a new promise for us. It is the same principle we apply at Academia del CIO, where sponsors neither choose the guests nor review the content before publication.

What we assess

  • Governance

    Is it clear who decides what, and according to which criteria?

  • Architecture

    Can your current architecture support what comes next?

  • Operations

    Do you operate through repeatable methods or heroic effort?

  • Development

    Do you deliver quality at a predictable pace?

  • Knowledge

    Does your knowledge reside within the organisation or only in people's heads?

  • Talent

    Do you have the capabilities required for what comes next?

Each dimension is scored from 1 to 5.

How we do it

  1. Phase 1: Discovery

    Weeks 1–2

    Your organisation's context and the scope of the assessment.

  2. Phase 2: Assessment

    Weeks 2–4

    Interviews and scoring across the six dimensions — evidence, not impressions.

  3. Phase 3: Intervention plan

    Weeks 4–5

    Priorities you can defend before the executive committee.

  4. Phase 4: Roadmap

    Weeks 5–6

    Sequenced quick wins and initiatives, including AI where appropriate.

What you receive

  • An assessment by dimension, scored from 1 to 5.
  • A map of strengths and gaps.
  • A prioritised 0–3 month and 3–12 month plan.
  • A sequenced AI roadmap — each use case is introduced when its foundations are ready.

What you will be able to decide

With this report, you will be able to decide where to intervene, in what order and over which timeframe — and support that decision with something more robust than personal judgement alone.

A real case

A financial institution asked us to identify the best AI opportunities within its technology operations. The assessment revealed low-maturity foundations: undocumented processes, no metrics and a strong dependence on individual knowledge.

  1. We paused the use cases

    Technology was not the first problem to solve.

  2. We reordered the priorities

    Processes, governance and knowledge came first.

  3. We sequenced AI

    Each use case is introduced when its foundations are ready.

Introducing AI on top of that foundation would have amplified the existing disorder.

Who leads the assessment

The six-dimension framework is led by Eugenio Ramírez, founder of Xpecializa.

It draws on seven years of close observation of the Spanish technology market, including the weekly Radar, and regular conversations with CIOs from major organisations through Academia del CIO.

The Technology Consulting Radar

A weekly analysis of the Spanish technology market: M&A, trends and senior team moves.

More than 100 editions published every Tuesday since 2024

Explore the Radar

Academia del CIO

Unscripted conversations with CIOs and technology leaders about the challenges facing the technology function.
Explore Academia del CIO

Frequently asked questions

Will this eventually become a sales pitch for your services?

No. The report and roadmap belong to you from day one, regardless of who implements them. There is no obligation or discount linked to hiring us afterwards.

Is six weeks realistic?

Yes, based on the four phases described above: two weeks of discovery, two weeks of assessment, and two weeks divided between the intervention plan and the roadmap.

What if I already know what the problem is?

The value of the Assessment is not necessarily discovering an unfamiliar problem. It is being able to prioritise it and defend that priority with structured evidence, rather than personal judgement alone.

Scope and investment

The scope and investment are tailored to your organisation — we discuss both in the first conversation.

Let's start with a conversation, not a contract

Thirty minutes to understand your context. We are not looking to close anything in that first conversation.

Not the right time yet? Subscribe to the Radar and decide at your own pace.